05 June 2023 | Monday | News
Image Source : Public Domain
– Objective Response Rate (ORR) Improved in Both Domvanalimab-Containing Study Arms Compared to Zimberelimab Monotherapy –
– Results Will Be Presented Today During the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting –
“Progression-free survival curves showed early separation of both domvanalimab-containing arms from the zimberelimab arm, which was consistently maintained, and supports the potential therapeutic benefit of inhibiting the TIGIT pathway,” said Melissa L. Johnson, M.D., Director, Lung Cancer Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Lead Investigator for the ARC-7 study. “I was also encouraged by the consistency of meaningful improvements across other outcome measures for the domvanalimab-containing arms. I look forward to continuing to work with Gilead and Arcus on the dom-zim combinations.”
At the time of data cutoff (DCO), February 7, 2023, safety and efficacy were evaluated in all patients randomized and treated (n=150). With a median follow-up time of approximately 18 months, both domvanalimab-containing study arms demonstrated sustained, clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to zimberelimab monotherapy, with a 33% reduction in risk of disease progression or death for the doublet and 28% for the triplet.
The efficacy data, including PFS and ORR, are summarized in the table below:
Endpoint |
zimberelimab (Z) monotherapy (n=50) |
domvanalimab + zimberelimab (DZ) (n=50) |
etrumadenant + domvanalimab + zimberelimab (EDZ) (n=50) |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) |
|
|
|
Median in Months (95% CI) |
5.4 (2.7, 9.7) |
9.3 (4.1, NE) |
9.9 (4.8, 14.6) |
Hazard Ratio* (95% CI) |
|
0.67 (0.4, 1.13) |
0.72 (0.63, 1.8) |
Six-month PFS rate (95% CI) |
45% (30, 59) |
58% (43, 72) |
62% (48, 76) |
12-month PFS rate (95% CI) |
25% (11, 40) |
41% (26, 56) |
44% (29, 59) |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
|
|
|
ORR+ Confirmed + Pending (95% CI) |
15 (30%) [17.9%, 44.6%] |
20 (40%)++ [26.4%, 54.8%] |
22 (44%) [30%, 58.7%] |
Complete Response |
1 (2%) |
1 (2%) |
0 (0%) |
Partial Response Confirmed |
14 (28%) |
18 (36%) |
22 (44%) |
Partial Response Pending |
0 (0%) |
1 (2%) |
0 (0%) |
Stable Disease |
16 (32%) |
18 (36%) |
16 (32%) |
Progressive Disease |
12 (24%) |
4 (8%) |
7 (14%) |
Not Evaluable (NE) |
7 (14%) |
8 (16%) |
5 (10%) |
CI=Confidence Interval |
*Comparing DZ and EDZ arms to Z monotherapy. |
+Per RECIST 1.1 |
++Across all arms, one participant in the DZ arm had a response pending confirmation, which was confirmed after DCO date. |
- Preliminary duration of response (DoR) analyses favor domvanalimab-containing arms, with median DoR (range, ‘+’: censored) as follows: Z: 13.2mo (+1.4-+19.4), DZ: not reached (2.8-+26.6), EDZ: 23.7mo (2.6-23.7). |
- As of the DCO, approximately twice as many participants remain on study treatment in the domvanalimab-containing arms compared to zimberelimab monotherapy [Z: (n=9), DZ: (n=17), EDZ: (n=20)]. |
- Consistent ORR and PFS improvements were shown for the domvanalimab-containing arms in a post-hoc analysis of centrally confirmed PD-L1-high patients. |
“At this analysis, the domvanalimab-containing study arms continued to show improved efficacy across multiple measures and both the doublet and triplet arms were generally well tolerated,” said Dimitry S.A. Nuyten, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Medical Officer of Arcus Biosciences. “These data reinforce our confidence in the domvanalimab program.”
“The ARC-7 proof-of-concept study has critically advanced our understanding of the activity of domvanalimab, the first Fc-silent anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody in pivotal trials,” said Bill Grossman, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Therapeutic Area Head, Gilead Oncology. “We look forward to quickly advancing our four ongoing Phase 3 registrational programs in NSCLC and upper GI cancers.”
No unexpected safety signals were observed across the three study arms at the time of DCO. The domvanalimab-containing study arms appeared to be generally well tolerated and showed an overall safety profile consistent with the known safety profiles of each individual molecule to date. Incidence of infusion-related reactions was low across all treatment arms: 4%, 4% and 12% for zimberelimab monotherapy and the domvanalimab-doublet and -triplet arms, respectively. The addition of domvanalimab to zimberelimab did not increase the incidence of infusion-related reactions, consistent with the Fc-silent design of domvanalimab.
Domvanalimab, zimberelimab and etrumadenant are investigational molecules. Neither Gilead nor Arcus has received approval from any regulatory authority for any use globally, and their safety and efficacy for the treatment of lung cancer have not been established.
Most Read
Bio Jobs
News